Leeto L. Allen v. State of Florida , 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3487 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                                      IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
    LEETO L. ALLEN,                      NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
    FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
    Appellant,                     DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
    v.                                   CASE NO. 1D15-5476
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Appellee.
    _____________________________/
    Opinion filed March 15, 2017.
    An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.
    Waddell A. Wallace, III, Judge.
    Leeto L. Allen, pro se, Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney
    General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    Leeto L. Allen appeals from the final order of the lower court denying his
    motions for postconviction relief. Those motions and Allen’s petition for writ of
    habeas corpus—which the lower court converted to a motion for postconviction
    relief—all raised the same arguments: Allen’s convictions and sentences should be
    vacated because the presiding trial court judge did not conduct an evidentiary
    hearing on his competency following the issuance of an October 5, 2010,
    competency evaluation finding him competent to proceed to trial, and did not enter
    an order expressly finding him competent to proceed. Important to our assessment
    of Allen’s contentions, Allen did not file a direct appeal.
    The lower court was correct in denying Allen relief. “The competency issue
    is procedurally barred because it should have been raised on direct appeal.” Patton v.
    State, 
    784 So. 2d 380
    , 393 (Fla. 2000) (citing Johnston v. Dugger, 
    583 So. 2d 657
    ,
    659 (Fla. 1991)); accord Thompson v. State, 
    88 So. 3d 312
    , 317 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
    (a defendant’s claim that the trial court “erred in failing to follow procedures to
    ensure competency can and must be raised on direct appeal only”) (emphasis in
    original) (citing Nelson v. State, 
    43 So. 3d 20
    , 33 (Fla. 2002)), rev. denied, 
    107 So. 3d 407
     (Fla. 2012). Likewise, a defendant’s substantive claim that he or she has a
    due process right not to be proceeded against while incompetent can be raised on
    direct appeal and is procedurally barred from being raised in a postconviction
    motion. Carroll v. State, 
    815 So. 2d 601
    , 609-10 (Fla. 2002); Patton, 
    784 So. 2d at 393
    .
    Allen did not raise his claim on direct appeal. Therefore, Allen is procedurally
    barred from raising it in a postconviction motion.
    AFFIRMED.
    2
    ROBERTS, C.J., JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CASE NO. 1D15-5476

Citation Numbers: 212 So. 3d 1112, 2017 WL 1014424, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 3487

Judges: Roberts, Jay, Winsor

Filed Date: 3/15/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024