Russ v. State , 230 So. 3d 510 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
    MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
    OF FLORIDA
    SECOND DISTRICT
    RODNEY LEON RUSS,                        )
    DOC #779516,                             )
    )
    Appellant,                  )
    )
    v.                                       )             Case No. 2D16-2009
    )
    )
    STATE OF FLORIDA,                        )
    )
    Appellee.                   )
    )
    Opinion filed October 6, 2017.
    Appeal from the Circuit Court for
    DeSoto County; Kimberly Bonner,
    Judge.
    Mark C. De Sisto, Port Charlotte, for
    Appellant.
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
    Tallahassee, and Chelsea S. Alper,
    Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,
    for Appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    Following the entry of a no contest plea to four felonies and two
    misdemeanors, Rodney Leon Russ now challenges the trial court's denial of his motion
    to suppress the evidence. However, because "there was neither a stipulation nor a
    determination by the trial court that the denial of the motion to suppress was
    dispositive," we affirm without further comment. Ferran v. State, 
    210 So. 3d 97
    , 97 (Fla.
    2d DCA 2016) (per curiam); see also Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i); Fla Stat.
    § 924.051(4) (2015); Leonard v. State, 
    760 So. 2d 114
    , 119 (Fla. 2000) (holding that
    "when the [district] court determines that an appeal does not present . . . a legally
    dispositive issue that was expressly reserved for appellate review," the district court
    should summarily affirm); Henderson v. State, 
    135 So. 3d 1092
    , 1095 (Fla. 2d DCA
    2013) (holding that where "there was no finding or agreement that the motion was
    dispositive, [the defendant] may not appeal the denial of the motion").
    Yet, because it appears that Mr. Russ "believed that his plea was
    conditioned upon the reservation of his right to appeal from the denial of his motion to
    suppress, our affirmance is without prejudice to [his] right to file a timely motion to
    withdraw his plea pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850." See 
    Ferran, 210 So. 3d at 97
    (first citing Sears v. State, 
    920 So. 2d 709
    , 709 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006);
    and then citing Sloss v. State, 
    917 So. 2d 941
    , 942 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005)).
    Affirmed.
    WALLACE, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Case 2D16-2009

Citation Numbers: 230 So. 3d 510

Judges: Wallace, Khouzam, Badalamenti

Filed Date: 10/6/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024