PEOPLE'S TRUST INSURANCE COMPANY v. ANTONIO J. SOCARRAS AND RACHEL SOCARRAS ( 2020 )


Menu:
  •        Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed November 18, 2020.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D19-1767
    Lower Tribunal No. 18-24447
    ________________
    People's Trust Insurance Company,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    Antonio J. Socarras and Rachel Socarras,
    Appellees.
    An Appeal from non-final orders from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade
    County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge.
    Brett Frankel and Jonathan Sabghir (Deerfield Beach); Cole, Scott & Kissane,
    P.A., and Mark D. Tinker (Tampa), for appellant.
    Marin, Eljaiek, Lopez, & Martinez, P.L., and Steven E. Gurian, for appellees.
    Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ.
    PER CURIAM.
    Affirmed. See People’s Trust Ins. Co. v. Ortega, 
    2020 WL 3443454
    , at *3
    (Fla. 3d DCA June 24, 2020) (“We have held that when an insurer reasonably
    disputes whether an insured has sufficiently complied with a policy's post-loss
    conditions so as to trigger the policy’s appraisal provision, a question of fact is
    created that must be resolved by the trial court before the trial court may compel
    appraisal. United Prop. & Cas. Ins. v. Concepcion, 
    83 So. 3d 908
    , 910 (Fla. 3d DCA
    2012) (citing Citizens Prop. Ins. v. Gutierrez, 
    59 So. 3d 177
    (Fla. 3d DCA 2011);
    Citizens Prop. Ins. v. Mango Hill Condo. Ass'n 12 Inc., 
    54 So. 3d 578
    (Fla. 3d DCA
    2011); Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Maytin, 
    51 So. 3d 591
    (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)).”);
    Am. Integrity Ins. Co. v. Estrada, 
    276 So. 3d 905
    , 914 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“[W]hile
    the interpretation of the terms of an insurance contract normally presents an issue of
    law, the question of whether certain actions constitute compliance with the contract
    often presents an issue of fact. See State Farm Fla. Ins. Co. v. Figueroa, 
    218 So. 3d 886
    , 888 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017) (‘Whether an insured substantially complied with
    policy obligations is a question of fact.’ (emphasis added); Solano v. State Farm Fla.
    Ins. Co., 
    155 So. 3d 367
    , 371 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (‘A question of fact remains as
    to whether there was sufficient compliance with the cooperation provisions of the
    policy to provide State Farm with adequate information to settle the loss claims or
    go to an appraisal, thus precluding a forfeiture of benefits owed to the insureds.’)
    (emphasis added).”).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 19-1767

Filed Date: 11/18/2020

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/18/2020