ALLEN LENOIR, M.D. v. STATE OF FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •       Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed February 17, 2021.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D19-2358
    Lower Tribunal No. 17-598MPI
    ________________
    Allen Lenoir, M.D.,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    State of Florida, Agency for Health Care Administration,
    Appellee.
    An Appeal from the State of Florida, Agency for Health Care
    Administration.
    Allen Lenoir, M.D., in proper person.
    Tracy Lee Cooper George (Tallahassee), Chief Appellate Counsel,
    and Nicholas A. Merlin (Tallahassee), Senior Attorney, for appellee.
    Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ.
    PER CURIAM.
    Affirmed. See Worster v. Dep’t of Health, 
    767 So. 2d 1239
    , 1240 (Fla.
    1st DCA 2000) (holding: “In an appeal from an administrative proceeding, a
    party cannot argue on appeal matters which were not properly excepted to
    or challenged before the agency”); Redfern v. Dep’t of Prof. Reg., 
    498 So. 2d 1313
    , 1315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (holding nurse failed to establish that the
    Department abused its discretion in declining to accept exceptions to a
    recommended order filed after expiration of the statutory time period for filing
    such submissions). See also § 120.68(7)(b), Fla. Stat. (2021) (providing that
    “the court shall not substitute its judgment for that of the agency as to the
    weight of the evidence on any disputed finding of fact”); Graham v. Estuary
    Props., Inc., 
    399 So. 2d 1374
    , 1380 (Fla. 1981) (noting: “The reviewing court
    cannot substitute its judgment for that of the agency on a finding of fact or
    the weight thereof”); Lenard v. A.L.P.H.A. “A Beginning” Inc., 
    945 So. 2d 618
    ,
    623 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (observing that “[w]hen reviewing the findings and
    conclusions of a government agency, this court is not permitted to substitute
    its judgment for that of the agency if competent, substantial evidence
    supports the agency's factual findings and the agency correctly applied the
    applicable statutory criteria.”)
    2