DUANE WALKER v. State ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •        Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed March 17, 2021.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D21-423
    Lower Tribunal No. F00-25707
    ________________
    Duane Walker,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    The State of Florida,
    Appellee.
    An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
    the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Zachary James, Judge.
    Duane Walker, in proper person.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
    Before EMAS, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and MILLER, JJ.
    PER CURIAM.
    Affirmed. See Bradley v. State, 
    3 So. 3d 1168
     (Fla. 2009) (holding that
    defect in the charging document, which omitted a required element for
    sentencing enhancement, was cured by defendant’s explicit waiver of such
    defect during plea colloquy); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(h)(2) (providing: “A
    second or successive motion is an extraordinary pleading. Accordingly, a
    court may dismiss a second or successive motion if the court finds that it fails
    to allege new or different grounds for relief and the prior determination was
    on the merits or, if new and different grounds are alleged, the judge finds
    that the failure of the defendant or the attorney to assert those grounds in a
    prior motion constituted an abuse of the procedure or there was no good
    cause for the failure of the defendant or defendant's counsel to have
    asserted those grounds in a prior motion.”)
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-0423

Filed Date: 3/17/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/17/2021