Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed April 7, 2021.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D20-0382
Lower Tribunal No. F05-4149
________________
Danyan Mangham,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa
Tinkler Mendez, Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant
Public Defender, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Assistant
Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Dayes v. Werner Enterprises, Inc., No. 3D19-1920,
2021 WL
262037, at *4 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 27, 2021) (quoting Linn v. Fossum,
946 So.
2d 1032, 1037-38 (Fla. 2006)) (“an expert’s testimony ‘may not merely be
used as a conduit for the introduction of the otherwise inadmissible
evidence’”); 50 State Sec. Serv., Inc. v. Giangrandi,
132 So. 3d 1128, 1136
(Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (“Where a trial court has weighed probative value against
prejudicial impact before reaching its decision, an appellate court shall not
overturn such a decision absent a clear abuse of discretion.”) (internal
citations omitted); Osagie v. State,
58 So. 3d 307, 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)
(finding error in admitting business records “without a custodian of the
records or other qualified person testifying as to the accuracy of the
records”).
2
