TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY and SCOTT ALBEE v. WEST BOCA COLLISION, INC. a/a/o ROSEMARY SOTO ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •         DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
    FOURTH DISTRICT
    TRAVELERS HOME AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, and
    SCOTT ALBEE,
    Appellants,
    v.
    WEST BOCA COLLISION, INC., a/a/o
    ROSEMARY SOTO,
    Appellee.
    No. 4D22-716
    [March 29, 2023]
    Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm
    Beach County; Frank S. Castor, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2017-SC-
    003317-XXXX-SB.
    Jack R. Reiter and Robert C. Weill of GrayRobinson, P.A., Miami, for
    appellants.
    Jeffrey J. Molinaro of Fuerst Ittleman David & Joseph, Miami, for
    appellee.
    PER CURIAM.
    We reverse the order requiring appellant and appellant’s attorney to pay
    $3,200 in attorney’s fees as a sanction for litigation conduct. 1 While a
    court has inherent authority to impose attorney’s fees against an attorney
    for bad faith conduct, the court must make “an express finding of bad faith
    conduct [which] must be supported by detailed factual findings describing
    the specific acts of bad faith conduct that resulted in the unnecessary
    incurrence of attorneys’ fees.” Moakley v. Smallwood, 
    826 So. 2d 221
    , 227
    (Fla. 2002). “Although the magic words ‘bad faith’ are not necessary, the
    trial court must use equivalent language to describe the sanctionable
    conduct.” Hicks v. Hicks, 
    284 So. 3d 576
    , 579 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019). While
    the order in this case detailed conduct that the court found “improper,”
    the court did not find bad faith or use any “equivalent language.” See 
    id.
    1We are without jurisdiction to address the remainder of the sanction order. See
    Ruppel v. Gulf Winds Apartments, Inc., 
    508 So. 2d 534
    , 535 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).
    We have examined the attorney’s conduct and cannot conclude that it
    constituted the type of vexatious litigation conduct that would warrant
    exercising the court’s inherent sanction authority.
    Reversed with directions to vacate the sanction order assessing
    attorney’s fees.
    GERBER and LEVINE, JJ., concur.
    WARNER, J., dissents without opinion.
    *        *       *
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-0716

Filed Date: 3/29/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/29/2023