LUIS LA-CASSE v. MARK S. INCH, etc. ( 2021 )


Menu:
  •       Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed July 28, 2021.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D21-1093
    Lower Tribunal No. F04-29879
    ________________
    Luis La-Casse,
    Petitioner,
    vs.
    Mark S. Inch, etc.,
    Respondent.
    A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus
    Luis La-Casse, in proper person.
    Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for respondent.
    Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and GORDO, JJ.
    ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
    PER CURIAM.
    On May 10, 2021, petitioner, Luis La-Casse, filed a petition for writ of
    habeas corpus in this court. Upon review of the petition, we determined that
    La-Casse had again filed a frivolous petition in our court. On May 11, 2021,
    we ordered La-Casse to show cause why he shouldn’t be prohibited from
    filing further pro se petitions, motions and appeals in this court, citing to our
    warning in La-Casse v. Inch, 
    307 So. 3d 921
     (Fla. 3d DCA 2020), wherein
    we warned La-Casse that continued abuse of the judicial process would
    result in an order prohibiting further pro se filings in our court. As we noted
    in La-Casse, in 2018, petitioner was precluded from filing any further pro se
    pleadings relating to trial court case number F04-29879. He appealed that
    order and we affirmed.
    Upon consideration of La-Casse’s response to our order to show cause
    and the successive, duplicative, pro se petitions and appeals brought by La-
    Casse, we conclude that good cause has not been shown. La-Casse has
    engaged in the filing of meritless, frivolous, and successive claims,
    continuing to seek relief from this Court notwithstanding prior adverse
    determinations on the merits.
    In accordance with State v. Spencer, 
    751 So. 2d 47
     (Fla. 1999), and
    Concepcion v. State, 
    944 So. 2d 1069
     (Fla. 3d DCA 2006), La-Casse is
    prohibited from filing any further pro se appeals, pleadings, motions, or
    2
    petitions relating to his conviction, judgment, and sentence in lower tribunal
    cases F04-29879. We direct the Clerk of this Court to refuse to accept any
    such papers relating to the specified circuit court case number unless they
    have been reviewed and signed by an attorney who is a duly licensed
    member of The Florida Bar in good standing. See Whipple v. State, 
    112 So. 3d 540
     (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 21-1093

Filed Date: 7/28/2021

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/28/2021