All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2014-03 |
-
PER CURIAM. We affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence for burglary of a dwelling, but reverse the judgment for grand theft because the evidence was insufficient to establish the value of the items at the time of the theft. Smith v. State, 955 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). We, therefore, remand for entry of a judgment for petit theft pursuant to section 812.014(3)(a), Florida Statutes (2011).
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
TORPY, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 5D12-253
Judges: Orfinger, Palmer, Torpy
Filed Date: 3/14/2014
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024