Rangel v. State , 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20195 ( 2012 )

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant raising his claims in a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Any such motion filed by Appellant shall not be considered successive so long as Appellant does not revisit the issue that was the subject of the trial court’s June 11, 2012 order.

MAY, C.J., POLEN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.