All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2013-08 |
-
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Valenzuela v. Globe-Ground, N. Am., LLC, 18 So.3d 17 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Fla. Dep’t of Cmty. Affairs v. Bryant, 586 So.2d 1205, 1209-10 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (“[T]he ultimate question of the existence of discrimination is a question of fact.... [A]n appellate court’s power to alter the lower tribunal’s finding in that regard is limited to those findings that are clearly erroneous.... Because discriminatory intent is an issue of fact ... it must be accepted by the reviewing agency unless that finding is not supported by [competent substantial evidence] in the record.”) (citations omitted).
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 3D12-2158
Citation Numbers: 119 So. 3d 567, 2013 WL 4529655, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13684
Judges: Rothenberg, Schwartz, Wells
Filed Date: 8/28/2013
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024