All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court of Appeal of Florida |
2014-11 |
-
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Gregory v. State, 937 So.2d 180, 183 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“[T]he defendant waived this issue, because he did not request the instruction and assented to the court’s decision to list trespass and battery separately on the verdict form. We have held that this is not fundamental error.”); see also Daniel v. State, 137 So.3d 1181, 1185 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) (holding that failure to instruct on trespass as a lesser-included offense three steps removed from armed burglary of a dwelling was harmless because the jury did not exercise its pardon power by finding defendant guilty of any of the lesser-included offenses one and two steps removed).
DAVIS, C.J., and LaROSE and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 2D13-1823
Judges: Davis, Larose, Morris
Filed Date: 11/26/2014
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024