Jackson v. State ( 2015 )

PER CURIAM.

See Neal v. State, 142 So.3d 883, 890 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (affirming conviction and sentence because, despite shortcomings in Anders¹ brief, the “court’s independent review of the record and applicable law revealed no reversible error in the circuit court’s proceedings”).

AFFIRMED.

CLARK and MAKAR, JJ., concur. BENTON, J., Concurs In Result Only.

1 . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).