UN MONDE NOUVEAU, INC., etc. v. YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA, INC., etc. ( 2023 )

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed May 17, 2023.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-1962
Lower Tribunal No. 20-14976
________________
Un Monde Nouveau, Inc.,
d/b/a A New World Academy,
Appellant,
vs.
Young Men's Christian Association of South Florida, Inc.,
a/k/a YMCA of South Florida, Inc.,
Appellee.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade
County, Gina Beovides, Judge.
Sheehe & Associates, P.A., Phillip J. Sheehe and Johanna E. Sheehe,
for appellant.
Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP, and Scott N. Wagner,
Brianna Sainte and Stephanie Koutsodendris, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See VME Group Int’l, LLC v. Grand Condo. Ass’n, Inc., 305
So. 3d 30, 31 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (“To obtain a temporary injunction, [New
World] had to satisfy the following five-part test: (1) the substantial likelihood
of success on the merits, (2) the likelihood of irreparable harm, (3) the
unavailability of an adequate remedy at law, (4) the threatened injury
outweighs the possible harm, and (5) the issuance of the temporary
injunction will not disserve the public interest. If the party seeking the
temporary injunction fails to establish any of these requirements, the party’s
motion for temporary injunction must be denied.”) (internal citation omitted);
Sammie Invs., LLC v. Strategica Capital Assocs., 247 So. 3d 596, 600 (Fla.
3d DCA 2018) (“The party seeking an injunction has the burden of providing
competent, substantial evidence satisfying each element.”); Cohen Fin., LP
v. KMC/EC II, LLC, 967 So. 2d 224, 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“In reviewing
a trial court’s ruling on a request for a temporary injunction, we must affirm
unless the appellant establishes that the trial court committed a clear abuse
of discretion.”).
2