Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed August 2, 2023.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D22-0952
Lower Tribunal No. 19-627-A-K
________________
Nicholas Ray Malicoat,
Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida,
Appellee.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Mark H. Jones,
Judge.
Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant
Public Defender, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Byron v. State,
273 So. 3d 1091, 1094 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
(quoting Thompson v. State,
88 So. 3d 312, 319 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)) (“Not
every manifestation of mental illness demonstrates incompetence to stand
trial; rather, the evidence must indicate a present inability to assist counsel
or understand the charges. Neither low intelligence, mental deficiency, nor
bizarre, volatile, and irrational behavior can be equated with mental
incompetence to stand trial.”); Cotton v. State,
177 So. 3d 666, 668 (Fla. 1st
DCA 2015) (“If the trial court does not have sufficient grounds to believe that
the defendant may lack competency, there is no obligation to hold a
competency hearing.”); Andrews v. State,
916 So. 2d 964, 966 (Fla. 5th DCA
2005) (“Defense counsel never asked for a competency exam, so, we must
assume that counsel believed [defendant] to be competent.”); Chery v. State,
642 So. 2d 1161, 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (“The trial court did not err in
failing to conduct an inquiry concerning the defendant’s mental competency
to stand trial as no showing of mental incompetency was ever made below,
and no defense request for such an inquiry was ever made below.”).
2
