MARKO SERRANO AND DOLORES SERRANO v. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •        Third District Court of Appeal
    State of Florida
    Opinion filed August 16, 2023.
    Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
    ________________
    No. 3D22-560
    Lower Tribunal No. 17-15551
    ________________
    Marko Serrano and Dolores Serrano,
    Appellants,
    vs.
    Citizens Property Insurance Corporation,
    Appellee.
    An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David C.
    Miller, Judge.
    Giasi Law, P.A. and Melissa A. Giasi, and Erin M. Berger (Tampa), for
    appellants.
    Nicklaus & Associates, P.A., and Edward R. Nicklaus, and Stephen P.
    Byrnes, for appellee.
    Before EMAS, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
    PER CURIAM.
    In this first-party property dispute, appellants, Marko and Dolores
    Serrano, appeal a final summary judgment rendered in favor of their insurer,
    appellee, Citizens Property Insurance Corporation.           Appellants filed a
    complaint seeking payment for a water-related loss under an all-risk
    homeowner’s policy. Citizens moved for summary judgment under Florida’s
    so-called “old” summary judgment standard. In so moving, Citizens failed to
    produce affidavits or other sworn proof establishing the claim was not
    covered or excluded under the policy. 1 Given this procedural deficiency, we
    are constrained to reverse the judgment under review and remand for further
    proceedings. See Star Lakes Ests. Ass’n, Inc. v. Auerbach, 
    656 So. 2d 271
    ,
    274 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (quoting Holl v. Talcott, 
    191 So. 2d 40
    , 43–44 (Fla.
    1966)) (“[T]he movant . . . has the initial burden to prove that there are no
    genuine, triable issues of material fact in dispute, ‘and the burden of proving
    the existence of such issues is not shifted to the opposing party until the
    movant has successfully met this burden.’”); see also Sec. First Ins. Co. v.
    Czelusniak, 
    305 So. 3d 717
    , 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (citation omitted)
    (“[W]ith an all-risk policy, the insured is only required to prove that damage
    occurred during the policy period. Subsequently, the burden shifts to the
    insurer to prove that one of the policy exclusions bars coverage.”); B & S
    1
    The Serranos filed an affidavit and expert report in opposition.
    2
    Assocs., Inc. v. Indem. Cas. & Prop., Ltd., 
    641 So. 2d 436
    , 437 (Fla. 4th DCA
    1994) (reversing summary judgment order where insurer did not meet its
    burden to prove that coverage was excluded under all-risk policy).
    Reversed and remanded.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-0560

Filed Date: 8/16/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/16/2023