- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION KHALED ABDEL-FATTAH, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:23-cv-659-CEM-LHP FATIMA BELAL and MOHAMED Z. DELHOUM, Defendants ORDER This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: MOTION TO RECONSIDER THE MOTION TO REMOVE CASES 226-2016-CV-00184/637 TO US DISTRICT COURT OF MIDDLE DISTRICE OF FLORIDA FROM HILLSBOROUGH SOUTH SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE (Doc. No. 12) FILED: May 17, 2023 THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.1 1 The Court does not require a response from Defendants to resolve the motion. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, previously filed a “Motion to Remove Cases 226- 2016-CV-00184/637 to US District Court of Middle Districe of Florida from Hillsborough South Superior Court of New Hampshire.” Doc. No. 6. Upon review, the Court denied that motion for failure to comply with the Local Rules and for failure to demonstrate that the relief sought (removal of cases from state court in New Hampshire to this Court to be combined with this matter) was proper. Doc. No. 10. Now, Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of that Order. Doc. No. 12. Upon review, the motion will be denied. First, the motion fails to comply with Local Rule 3.01(g). Second, “[m]otions for reconsideration are permitted when there is (1) an intervening change in controlling law; (2) newly discovered evidence; or (3) the need to correct clear error or manifest injustice.” Stallworth v. Omninet Village, L.P., No. 6:16-cv-546-Orl- 31DAB, 2016 WL 10100424, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 23, 2016) (citing Tristar Lodging, Inc. v. Arch Speciality Ins. Co., 434 F. Supp. 2d 1286, 1301 (M.D. Fla. 2006), aff’d, 215 F. App’x 879 (11th Cir. 2007))). Plaintiff’s Motion fails to satisfy any of these standards. See Doc. No. 12. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. No. 12) is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on May 26, 2023. ayn □□□□ LESLIE AN PRICE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties -3-
Document Info
Docket Number: 6:23-cv-00659
Filed Date: 5/26/2023
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 6/21/2024