Nobles v. Electriduct, Inc. ( 2020 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 20-60899-CIV-DIMITROULEAS PATRICIA NOBLES, Plaintiffs, vs. ELECTRIDUCT, INC., et al, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Verified Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [DE 42], and the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow [DE 48]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 48] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 48] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 48] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning and conclusions. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 48] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Plaintiff’s Verified Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [DE 42] is GRANTED in part; 1 3, Plaintiff is awarded attorneys’ fees in the amount of $20,000.00 and costs in the amount of $450.00. 4. This remanded action shall remain CLOSED. Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 7" day of December, 2020. f a ? ; 2 (F a | / . f Poff a3 v Py j ‘4 ta ase □□ fe a VAY “2, A (Ma VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies to: Counsel of record Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow