Alicea v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security ( 2022 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 21-60760-DIMITROULEAS/SNOW CHRISTIAN ALICEA, Plaintiff, vs. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. _____________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 25], Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 30], and the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow [DE 33], issued on March 11, 2022. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 33] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 33] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 33] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 33] is hereby ADOPTED and APPROVED; 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 25] is hereby DENIED; 3. Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 30] is hereby GRANTED; and 4. The Court will enter separate final judgment. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida this 28th day of March, 2022. f a ? ; 2 (F a : “4 i} f J qememnaffl ve ea a3 v Py j ‘4 ta ase □□ VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record