Reef Azul, LLC v. Potter ( 2022 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 22-CV-80815-WPD REEF AZUL, LLC and ROSIBEL MARTINO, Plaintiffs, V. STEVEN M. POTTER and NICHOLAS G. POTTER Defendants. / ORDER ADOPTING AND APPROVING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE [DE 39]; DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS [DE 25] THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 [DE 25], and the August 22, 2022 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) [DE 39]. The Court notes that no objections to the Report [DE 39] have been filed, and the time for filing such objections has passed. As no timely objections were filed, the Magistrate Judge’s factual findings in the Report [DE 39] are hereby adopted and deemed incorporated into this opinion. LoConte v. Dugger, 847 F.2d 745, 749-50 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 958 (1988); RTC v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Although no timely objections were filed, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the Report [DE 39] and record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s analysis and conclusions. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report [DE 39] is ADOPTED and APPROVED; and 2. Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 [DE 25] is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 7th day of September, 2022. f a ? ; 2 (F a “4 if { FO etre zd a3 v ty j ‘4 ta ase Af VILLIAM P. DIMITROULEAS United States District Judge Copies to: Counsel of Record Magistrate Judge McCabe