Loughridge v. Wilson & Co. , 102 Ga. 524 ( 1897 )

Simmons, C. J.

The note sued on was, under our law, a negotiable instru-

ment, and a bona fide holder before due was protected as such; and there being no evidence in the record of legal payment to the holder, it was not error for the court to direct a verdict for the plaintiffs.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

The court directed a verdict for plaintiffs, and defendant ex-cepted.

R. J. & J. McCamy, for plaintiff in error. Shumate & Maddox, contra.