Cochran v. State ( 1899 )

Lumpkin, P. J.

1. The evidence was amply sufficient, both as to venue and. as to the guilt of the accused.

2. It does not, after a careful examination of all the evidence, pro and con, relating to the ground of the motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, appear that the court erred in adjudging that this ground was without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

AU the Justices concurring.