-
Lumpkin, P. J. 1. The only special ground of the motion for a new trial, to wit, that which related to the refusal of the court to postpone or continue, was not fully verified. As qualified by the judge’s certificate, it was plainly without merit.
2. There was sufficient evidence to warrant the verdict, and it does not appear that the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 110 Ga. 311, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 398, 35 S.E. 153
Judges: Lumpkin
Filed Date: 2/26/1900
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/7/2024