Almand v. Nash & Co. , 116 Ga. 424 ( 1902 )

Pish, J.

The testimony objected to was properly admitted ; the evidence, while conflicting, was sufficient to support the verdict; and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for a new trial. 1

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.