Baird v. Bate , 116 Ga. 439 ( 1902 )

Eish, J.

There was no error in admitting or rejecting evidence ; the alleged newly discovered evidence could have been discovered by the exercise of ordinary diligence ; the charges complained of were substantially correct ; and the evidence warranted the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumpkin, P. J., absent.