Winn v. State ( 1902 )

Eish, 3.

There being no complaint that any error of law was committed on the trial, there being evidence to sustain the verdict, and the trial judge being satisfied, therewith, the Supreme Court will not reverse the judgment denying a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lumplcin, P. J., absent, and Candler, J., not presiding.