Giliard v. State ( 1909 )

Atkinson, J.

1. Under the showing made there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for a continuance.

2. There being no grounds of the motion for a new trial except the general grounds and the overruling of the motion for a continuance, and the evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, there was no error in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.