-
Lumpkin, J. 1. There was no abuse' of discretion in refusing to grant a continuance.
2. The newly discovered evidence was not such as to require a new trial.
3. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and there was no abuse of discretion in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 135 Ga. 312, 69 S.E. 476, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 515
Judges: Lumpkin
Filed Date: 11/15/1910
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/7/2024