Gillespie v. Ewing , 1912 Ga. LEXIS 682 ( 1912 )

Fish, C. J.

1. None of the exceptions taken to the instructions given to the jury, when considered in connection with the entire charge, required the grant of a new trial.

2. The evidence, though conflicting, authorized the verdict, and the refusal of a new trial will not he disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. F. A. Cantrell and Maddox, McCamy & Shumate, for plaintiffs in error. O. N. Starr, contra.