Anderson v. Sheffield ( 1913 )

Lumpkin, J.

The evidence introduced before the ordinary, on the hearing of a writ of habeas corpus brought for the purpose of determining the custody of a minor child, was conflicting; and there was no abuse of discretion on the part of the judge of the superior court in sustaining a writ of certiorari to the judgment of the ordinary, and remanding the case for another trial. Buice v. Buice, 111 Ga. 887 (36 S. E. 969).

Judgment affirmed.

Beck, J., absent. The other Justices concur.