-
Beck, J. In several of the extracts from the charge to the jury, which were criticised in the motion for a new trial, there are palpable inaccuracies; but the instructions which the court gave upon the controlling issues in the case were substantially correct; and there being evi
*617 dence to support tlie verdict, this court will not interfere with the judgment of the court below refusing a new trial. •March 13, 1917. Equitable petition. Before Judge Eite. Dade superior court. July 34, 1916. Payne & Hale, for plaintiff in error. Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.
Document Info
Judges: Beck
Filed Date: 3/13/1917
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/7/2024