Kelly v. State ( 1929 )

Beck, P. J.,

From an examination of the evidence it appears that there is no merit in the contention of the plaintiff in error that the verdict is contrary to the evidence and without evidence to support it. .

Jtidgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. C. F. Richter and Jeff A. Pope, for plaintiff in error. George M. Napier, attorney-general, Robert B. Short, solicitor-general, and T. R. Gress, assistant attorney-general, contra.