-
Jackson, C. J. 1. The evidence sustains the verdict.
2. There was no such error in the refusals to charge as to require a ■new trial. In substance, all were given, and the entire charge is as ■favorable to the plaintiff in error as the law and facts would allow.
3. The confessions were made voluntarily, and are corroborated -abundantly by the bill of sale, the money and the inconsistency of the ^statements themselves.
Judgment affirmed.
Document Info
Judges: Jackson
Filed Date: 7/1/1885
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/18/2024