Roberts v. State ( 1885 )


Menu:
  • Jackson, C. J.

    1. The evidence sustains the verdict.

    2. There was no such error in the refusals to charge as to require a ■new trial. In substance, all were given, and the entire charge is as ■favorable to the plaintiff in error as the law and facts would allow.

    3. The confessions were made voluntarily, and are corroborated -abundantly by the bill of sale, the money and the inconsistency of the ^statements themselves.

    Judgment affirmed.

Document Info

Judges: Jackson

Filed Date: 7/1/1885

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2024