Smith v. Picket ( 1849 )


Menu:
  • *105By the Court.

    Lumpkin, J.

    delivering the opinion.

    [1.] We think the Court was right in holding Smith liable upon the garnishment. This was a contract of bailment merely, evidenced by the receipt; and the baifor* having been garnisheed before the cotton was sold by the bailee^" he became responsible to the creditor of Hardwick upon the summons, and delivered over the property in his own wrong.

    Let the judgment be affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 21

Judges: Lumpkin

Filed Date: 7/15/1849

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/7/2024