-
By the Court.
Benning. J. delivering the opinion.
In this case, neither party was in the State, or was a citizen in, or a resident of the State, or, as far as appears, had property in the State.
*474 It was, therefore, a case over which no Court of the State, had, or could have, any jurisdiction — a cáse to which no law of the State could possibly extend.We think, therefore, that the Court was right, in refusing to “ allow service to be perfected by publication.”
Judgment affirmed.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 25 Ga. 473
Judges: Benning
Filed Date: 6/15/1858
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024