McNaughton v. State , 138 Ga. 412 ( 1912 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    This was an extraordinary motion for new trial upon the ground of alleged newly discovered evidence. In view of the rebutting evidence submitted by the State on the hearing of the motion, and the improbability, considering the evidence upon the trial, that the alleged newly discovered evidence would produce a different result on another trial, the judgment refusing a new trial must be affirmed. See Malone v. State, 49 Ga. 221, and other cases collated in 14 Michie’s Dig. 398.

Document Info

Citation Numbers: 138 Ga. 412, 75 S.E. 251, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 326

Judges: Atkinson

Filed Date: 7/11/1912

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/7/2024