Johnson v. Central of Georgia Railway Co. ( 1916 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    Under the evidence in this case the court did not err in granting a nonsuit at the conclusion of the testimony introduced by the plaintiff.

    Judgment affirmed.

    All the Justices concur, except Beck, J., dissenting. ' Action for damages. Before Judge Mathews. Houston superior court. October 20, 1914. Hall & Roberts, for plaintiff. Battle & Hollis, for defendant.

Document Info

Filed Date: 2/25/1916

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/7/2024