-
Lumpkin, J. There was no legal merit in the motion for a continu-, anee; and as, under the facts in evidence, the property levied on was manifestly, and beyond doubt, subject to the plaintiffs’ exe* cution, there was no error in directing a verdict accordingly.
Judgment affirmed,.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 96 Ga. 776, 22 S.E. 333
Judges: Lumpkin
Filed Date: 5/13/1895
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/7/2024