Tyrance McCall v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Court of Appeals
    of the State of Georgia
    ATLANTA,____________________
    April 16, 2019
    The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
    A19I0204. TYRANCE MCCALL v. COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY.
    Tyrance McCall, a Florida resident, filed a negligence and product liability
    action in Gwinnett County State Court against Defendants Cooper Tire & Rubber
    Company, Pars Car Sales, Inc., and Karla Gould, a resident of Gwinnett County.
    McCall sought damages for injuries he sustained as a result of an automobile collision
    that occurred in Florida after a tire manufactured by Cooper Tire in Arkansas failed
    when McCall was riding as a passenger in Gould’s vehicle.
    Cooper Tire filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, which
    the trial court granted. McCall then filed a motion for reconsideration on the ground
    that the trial court failed to consider its jurisdictional argument that pursuant to
    OCGA §§ 9-10-90 and 9-10-91, Cooper Tire is subject to the personal jurisdiction
    of Georgia courts by virtue of being registered to conduct business in this State.
    Cooper Tire opposed the motion, arguing that the trial court properly applied the
    boundaries of due process in connection with its conclusion that it lacked general
    personal jurisdiction over Cooper Tire. The trial court agreed with Cooper Tire and
    denied the motion for reconsideration, reasoning that statutory law must give way to
    constitutional law. The trial court certified its ruling for immediate review, and this
    application for interlocutory review followed. Cooper Tire subsequently filed a
    motion to transfer this case to the Supreme Court.
    The Supreme Court of Georgia “has exclusive jurisdiction over all cases
    involving construction of the Constitution of the State of Georgia and of the United
    States and all cases in which the constitutionality of a law, ordinance, or
    constitutional provision has been called into question.” Atlanta Independent School
    System v. Lane, 
    266 Ga. 657
    , 657 (1) (469 SE2d 22) (1996); Ga. Const. of 1983, Art.
    VI, Sec. VI, Para. II (1). In light of Cooper Tire’s arguments that to the extent the
    statutes upon which McCall relies establish general jurisdiction, they are
    unconstitutional, the trial court’s ruling is “effectively a distinct ruling on the
    constitutional issues[.]” Rouse v. Dept. of Natural Resources, 
    271 Ga. 726
    , 728 (1)
    (524 SE2d 455) (1999); see also Hancock County v. Williams, 
    230 Ga. 723
    , 724 (1)
    (198 SE2d 659) (1973). Thus, this case appears to fall within the Supreme Court’s
    exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction. We further note that the Supreme Court has “the
    ultimate responsibility for construing the constitutional provisions regarding appellate
    jurisdiction[.]” Saxton v. Coastal Dialysis & Med. Clinic, 
    267 Ga. 177
    , 178 (476
    SE2d 587) (1996).1
    Accordingly, Cooper Tire’s motion to transfer is hereby GRANTED, and this
    application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.
    Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
    Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
    04/16/2019
    I certify that the above is a true extract from
    the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
    Witness my signature and the seal of said court
    hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
    , Clerk.
    1
    Compare Subaru of America v. Scanlon, Case No. S19I0691, decided March
    6, 2019 (case transferred to Court of Appeals “[b]ecause the trial court did not
    expressly address the constitutionality of OCGA § 14-2-510 (b), and because its
    ruling on specific jurisdiction obviated the need to resolve the constitutional issue
    about general jurisdiction”). In the instant case, the trial court ruled on the
    constitutional issue of general jurisdiction.