Vaughn v. State , 29 Ga. App. 388 ( 1923 )

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence in this case was wholly circumstantial and did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt. The court, therefore, erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Tyson & Tyson, for plaintiff in error. J. Saxton Daniel, contra.