McIntyre v. Habersham Bank ( 1918 )


Menu:
  • Jenkins, J.

    Under the facts and procedure as here presented, it was,not error to vacate the previous judgment of the court and reinstate the case on the docket for trial. Civil Code (1910), § 5958. Ford v. Clark, 129 Ga. 292 (58 S. E. 818); Turner v. Jordan, 67 Ga. 604; East Tenn. Railway Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 35, 37, (22 S. E. 36); Gillespie v. Farkas, 19 Ga. App. 158 (91 S. E. 244).

    Judgment affirmed.

    Wade, O. J., and Luke, J., concur. J. M. Pitner, George M. DuBose, for plaintiff in error, C. E. Sutton, contra,

    cited: Civil Code (1910), §§ 4964, 4955, 6278; Hughes v. Coursey, 46 Ga. 116; East Tenn. &c. Ry. Co. v. Greene, 95 Ga. 37; McWilliams v. Standard &c. Co., 92 Ga. 438-9.

Document Info

Docket Number: 8952

Judges: Jenkins

Filed Date: 3/13/1918

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024