Graham v. State , 22 Ga. App. 275 ( 1918 )

Broyles, P. J.

1. The instruction complained of was not erroneous for the reasons assigned.

2. There was some evidence which authorized the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been • approved by the trial judge, this court has no authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Eanoell, JJ., concur.

Accusation, of possessing intoxicating liquor; from city court of Poik county—Judge John K. Davis. February 16, 1918.

Irwin & Tison, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Wright, solicitor, contra.