Osterholtz v. State , 22 Ga. App. 649 ( 1918 )

Bloodwoetii, J.^

The accused was tried by the judge without the intervention of a jury. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction, and this court will not interfere with the discretion of the trial judge in overruling the motion for new trial, which was based on general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.