Littlefield v. State ( 1918 )

Harwell, J.

The evidence amply authorized .the defendant’s conviction of having and possessing intoxicating liquors, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Indictment for possession of intoxicating liquor; from Whitfield superior court—Judge Tarver. April 10, 1918.

W~ E. Mann, Olénn & House, for .plaintiff in error. Joseph M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.