Haugabook v. State , 26 Ga. App. 63 ( 1920 )


Menu:
  • Luke, J.

    The evidence in this case was sufficient to authorize the conviction of the defendant; and since the verdict of guilty has the approval of the trial judge, and there being no assignments of error insisted upon except the general grounds of the motion for a new trial, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

    Judgment affirmed.

    Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., oonour.

Document Info

Docket Number: 11727

Citation Numbers: 26 Ga. App. 63, 105 S.E. 381, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 273

Judges: Luke

Filed Date: 12/16/1920

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024