Shahan v. State ( 1922 )

Luke, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense of manufacturing liquor. His conviction was dependent entirely upon circumstantial evidence. A careful examination of the entire record convinces us that his conviction was not authorized. It is not necessary to consider the special grounds of the motion for a new trial. It was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed,

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Broyles, C. J., dissents.