Bazemore v. State , 28 Ga. App. 484 ( 1922 )


Menu:
  • Lube, J.

    The only question argued in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error is that raised by the exceptions pendente lite; and, there being in the main bill of exceptions no assignment of error upon either the exceptions pendente lite or the judgment complained of therein, this court cannot consider the exceptions pendente lite.

    ■Judgment affirmed.

    Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: 13336

Citation Numbers: 28 Ga. App. 484, 111 S.E. 694, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 634

Judges: Lube

Filed Date: 4/13/1922

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024