Williams v. State ( 1922 )

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence did not authorize the defendant’s conviction of the offense charged, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. B. H. Humphrey, Arthur W. Jordan, for plaintiff

in error, cited: 119 Ga. 118; 97 Ga. 209; 74 Ga. 840; 12 Ga. App. 551; 17 Ga. App. 295; Id. 728 (1), and cit.; 5 Ga. App. 228; 12 Ga. App. 363; 34 Ga. 342; 17 Ga. App. 820.

Walter F. Grey, solicitor-general, contra.