Reeves v. State ( 1924 )

Broyles, O. J.

Under the evidence and the defendant’s statement to the jury, his conviction was demanded, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial requires another hearing -of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Blood/worth, JJ., concur. Glande V. Driver, lor plaintiff in error. F. 8. Griffith, solicitor-general, contra.