Burnett v. State , 30 Ga. App. 261 ( 1923 )


Menu:
  • Luke, J.

    1. The motions to dismiss the bills of exceptions are denied.

    2. Under the particular facts of these cases the court did not err in dismissing the motions for a new trial. See Patterson v. State, 28 Ga. *262App. 668; Garraux v. Ross, 150 Ga. 645; Reed v. Warnock, 146 Ga. 483. Judgment affirmed.

    Decided May 15, 1923. Broyles, O. J., and Bloodicorth, J., coneut. ■J. T. Sislc, for plaintiff in error. A. S. Shelton, solicitor-general, George 0. Grogan, contra.

Document Info

Docket Number: 14342, 14343

Citation Numbers: 30 Ga. App. 261, 117 S.E. 764, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 382

Judges: Luke

Filed Date: 5/15/1923

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/8/2024